Ruckelshaus on EPA

Bill Ruckelshaus, the first Administrator of the US EPA in 1970 (and one of my heroes), published a wonderful op-ed piece in the New York Times today.  The piece discusses his return to EPA in the early 1980s, under the Reagan Administration, and the parallels to the current attacks and controversies regarding the EPA as well as lessons.

At the time Ruckelshaus was asked by Reagan to come back after the chaos and turmoil that then-EPA Administrator Anne Gorsuch inflicted on the EPA during the early early years of the Reagan Administration.  Gorsuch was forced to resign, and Ruckelshaus was confirmed as the new EPA Administrator. (Coincidentally, Anne Gorsuch was the late mother of the pending US Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch. )  There is another interesting, but less well known aspect of Ruckelshaus.  After his stint as head of EPA (1970-1973), he became Deputy Attorney General at the US Department of Justice under Attorney General Elliot Richardon.  Later in 1973, together with Richardson, he resigned as part of the “Saturday night massacre” for refusing to fire Archibald Cox, who was then investigating Watergate and President Nixon.

Climate Change and Maple Sugaring in Vermont

 

david-sillowayYesterday night (Friday, 3/3), CBS Evening News ran a segment on the recent unusual weather patterns in the country .   At about 0:42, our good Vermont friend David Silloway was interviewed about how maple sugaring season has come earlier and earlier over the years.  [For those who are unfamiliar with how maple sugar is made, here is a link to the Silloway Farm’s  maple sugar website.]  Why is that so important to the Vermont maple sugar industry?  Maple trees can only be tapped for sap (for making into maple syrup) during a few-weeks-long window of time in the transition from winter to spring when temperatures drop below freezing at night and then rise above freezing during the day. Unfortunately, climate change has long been identified as a threat to the Vermont maple sugar industry, both because of the added variability of time when tapping of trees is possible but also because it affects the quality of the syrup that is produced — one concrete example of how climate change will affect the U.S. economy.

Position: Georgetown Law School Climate Center, Institute Associate (Deadline: none provided, Washington, DC)

https://georgetown.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/Georgetown_Admin_Careers/job/Law-Center/Institute-Associate–Georgetown-Climate-Center—Georgetown-University-Law-Center_JR00319

  • Institute Associate, Georgetown Climate Center – Georgetown University Law Center

  • Requirements

    Institute Associate, Georgetown Climate Center – Georgetown University Law Center

    The nonpartisan Georgetown Climate Center – part of Georgetown Law – seeks to advance effective climate and energy policies in the United States and serves as a resource to state and local communities that are working to cut carbon pollution and prepare for climate change.  The Center informs the development of state and federal policies that:

    • Reduce carbon pollution from power plants and stationary sources.
    • Support clean and resilient transportation options.
    • Help communities adapt to climate change.

    The Center works with states, power companies, and non-profit organizations to inform the development and implementation of EPA’s Clean Power Plan and facilitates the Transportation and Climate Initiative — a collaboration that seeks to reduce carbon pollution from the transportation sector across 11 states and Washington, D.C. The Center also helps states and communities prepare for climate change impacts and works to integrate adaptation planning into all levels of government decision-making.

    The Institute Associate/Project Manager for Power Sector works with the Center ‘s leadership  to conduct advanced research and writing assignments, manage complex projects, manage ongoing state engagement processes, present to external audiences, conduct outreach, and coordinate with outside partners and contractors.  Reporting to the Mitigation Program Manager, the Institute Associate/Project Manager has duties that include but are not limited to:

    • Conducts policy and legal research, analysis and writing on relevant climate policy topics – for example, state power and transportation sector greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation policies.
    • Manages and facilitates state engagement processes, including organizing convenings and regular group calls.
    • Conducts engagement with states and other stakeholders through meetings and calls.
    • Represents the Center at conferences, dialogues, and events.
    • Supervises and coordinates the work of staff, research assistants, outside contractors, and outside partners.
    • Serves as a high-functioning team member with leadership responsibilities.
    • Identifies and responds to opportunities for funding and outreach.

    Requirements

    • Master’s degree – Juris Doctor or equivalent preferred
    • At least 3 years of experience in power sector or transportation sector mitigation policy or related work – for example, clean energy
    • Project management experience, as well as and academic and working knowledge of power sector and/or transportation sector climate change mitigation
    • Strong interpersonal skills, professionalism, and sound judgment
    • Experience using Microsoft office products – for example, developing PowerPoint presentations, creating Excel spreadsheets

    Submission Guidelines:

    If you currently work at Georgetown University, please exit this website and login to GMS (gms.georgetown.edu) using your Net ID and password. Please select the Career worklet on your GMS Home dashboard to view Jobs at Georgetown.

    Please note that in order to be considered an applicant for any position at Georgetown University you must submit a cover letter and resume  for each position of interest for which you believe you are qualified. These documents are not kept on file for future positions.

    Need Assistance:

    If you are a qualified individual with a disability and need a reasonable accommodation for any part of the application and hiring process, please click here for more information, or contact the Office of Institutional Diversity, Equity, and Affirmative Action (IDEAA) at 202-687-4798 or ideaa@georgetown.edu.

    Need some assistance with the application process? Please call 202-687-2500

    EEO Statement:

    Georgetown University is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer fully dedicated to achieving a diverse faculty and staff.  All qualified applicants are encouraged to apply and will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, disability status, protected veteran status, or any other characteristic protected by law.

Executive Order Calling for Review of WOTUS Rule

Trump issued an Executive Order yesterday calling for review and revision of the Waters of the United States rule:  “Presidential Executive Order on Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule.”  What’s the significance of the WOTUS rule?  Most generally, it defines the jurisdictional reach of the Army Corps of Engineers and EPA under the Clean Water Act.

The fanfare of this, and other prior Executive Orders, is rather ironic.  While the substantive policy decision of the Order to review and revise the rule is of great concern for the environment and public health, putting it in an executive order had little significance.  As Richard Revesz was quoted by the New York Times, Trump could have saved himself some time and done the same with a phone call or a tweet.  Since the rule was promulgated in 2015, any change or effort to rescind it would have to go through the same notice and comment administrative procedure act process as the original rule.  In other words, nothing is going to happen quickly.  And once a new rule has been promulgated, it will likely be challenged in court, just as the existing rule is now in litigation.

The other irony of the Executive Order?  Section 1 of the Order purports to  minimize regulatory uncertainty.  Changing this promulgated rule will create new uncertainty about the EPA’s and the Army Corps’ regulatory reach.